Destructive behavior in conflict
This type of behavior in a conflict situation implies that the person is aimed at expanding the dispute, humiliating the opponent and his point of view, and also shows distrust of the opponent.
In other words, the destructive model of personality behavior in conflict is characterized by the following techniques:
- intimidation and threats (“I’ll complain to the boss”);
- humiliation and insult of a partner (“you don’t know what you’re talking about”);
- denial of the authority of another person, constant references to one’s own authority (“I’m better at this than you);
- avoidance of discussing the conflict (“I don’t see any difficulties in this”);
- flattery (“you understand everything better than me, so you will find a solution to the problem yourself”).
See also - Tough tactics of behavior in conflict
Softer techniques can also be used. Any methods of manipulation are used that allow one to use the opponent to achieve personal goals.
Constructive actions instead of destructive thoughts
It happens that a person quarreled with someone, or was offended by someone, or was offended by someone, or simply did not notice how a bad mood “attacked” him. There can be many reasons, but the consequences are the same - a depressed state, the way out of which, as a rule, will not happen soon, and for many by chance, and not with their own help. What to do when you realize that there is nowhere to wait for help, and being in this state is very painful, and therefore you don’t want to?
Make it a rule in any such situation to think: I can be offended , upset and plunge into the abyss of dark thoughts, then experience my unhappiness for a long time, losing my own strength (after all, sadness and pain are exhausting). But I can do something else : try to understand - what if my way of thinking or acting (as well as my style of communicating with other people) led me to such a bleak situation? So I can learn to do things differently! How to do it? To begin with , instead of worrying , I can think about what lesson I need to learn from what happened? And the first lesson in all such situations (regardless of the reasons and the actors) is not to plunge yourself into the abyss of sadness, but to act. And to act not as before (so as not to get the same undesirable result), but differently. But how else? - and you have to think. And this is where you should direct your thoughts and energy. A person who always uses only one path greatly limits himself in possibilities and choices. Moreover, if it has been proven in practice that this path does not lead to the desired results. Why keep repeating the same thing? To be defeated again? But we hardly want this. And if we want something different, then we need to take different actions. Come up with new ways and means of solving problems. Watch people who do things differently and achieve the results you want. Read, try, learn. This is really worth spending your energy and thoughts on.
What does this give and why do all this? In any person there is constructive and destructive : the first helps to create and improve, and the second leads to destruction and deterioration (of one’s well-being, relationships with people, etc.).
The thoughts and questions listed above are written by me to help you think and act constructively. And the choice is yours - to act for your own benefit or harm. Of course, when you are used to reacting in the same sad way for many years and you try to start something else, it turns out that acting for your own good at first is much more difficult, because inertia pulls you in - the habit of feeling sorry for yourself, blaming others, circumstances, and just laziness. But how easy and pleasant it becomes later, when through independent work you develop new response skills, develop yourself, become more flexible and agile - both in your thinking and in your behavior. Isn’t it worth the effort for some time, so that thanks to today’s work on yourself, you can find a completely different tomorrow?
Conformist model of behavior in conflict
In turn, the conformist model of personality behavior in a conflict is determined by passivity and a tendency to make concessions. With this option, a person easily agrees with the opponent’s point of view and avoids “sharp corners.”
The danger of this model lies in the fact that the opponent, seeing the partner’s disinterest, may begin to show aggression. In essence, the conformist model is destructive.
However, this behavior can also have a positive aspect. This is possible when the cause of the conflict is insignificant. In such a situation, the conformist model will lead to a speedy resolution of the dispute.
To summarize, we note that the most desirable and acceptable is a constructive model of behavior in conflict.
What does constructive thinking look like?
This ability itself is given to us by nature. But, like all human abilities, it requires learning and development. But we remember that it’s never too late to learn, right? After all, constructive thinking is nothing more than a skill. And like any skill, it is developed and becomes a habit.
This is where the difficulty lies. If we don’t think constructively, that means we’re not thinking constructively, right? And this unconstructive thinking, subject to emotions and ready to deviate to the side for any reason, is so familiar that it seems natural.
Let's define the practical “application” of constructive thinking. That is, let's try to understand why and when it is applicable.
Oddly enough, constructive thinking is not always and everywhere appropriate. Based on logic, it is effective in making decisions in situations that can be analyzed logically. Are exceptions possible? Certainly! For example, when a decision should be dictated primarily by the heart and feelings. Or intuition. The main and most difficult thing here is to clearly understand when to “give in to your feelings” and when to “turn on your head.”
Constructive thinking is characterized by:
1. Specificity.
There is nothing “in general”, “as always”, “usually”, etc. We always formulate a specific task. And the more specific, clear, definite, the better.
2. Focus.
Having decided on a topic, a task, a goal, we don’t let our thoughts wander throughout the tree... that is, we don’t go away from the topic. No matter how much you want to deviate from the main task. This applies to both the stage of formulating the problem and the stage of solving it. If you catch yourself getting distracted, immediately return to the main task. It's difficult, but over time it turns into a sustainable skill. Always remember: you are solving a specific and very specific problem!
And when it is solved, we can remember what else interesting came to our mind in the process of thinking about the main problem. And maybe focus on a new worthy goal...
3. Detachment from emotions.
It is impossible to get rid of emotions. And it’s not necessary - that’s why we are living people, to feel and experience. But you will have to temporarily abstract yourself from emotions, as if putting them aside. I repeat: do not get rid of it, but distance yourself. It would be nice to analyze the feelings/emotions/experiences themselves at the same time. Of course, not all, but those directly related to this specific task.
Alas, feelings too often interfere where it would be worth thinking. And we don't make the best decisions. After all, feelings are not always positive, such as sympathy, joy, pleasure. No less often (and maybe more often) our choices are dictated by fear, anger, anger. No one declares these (or any other) feelings unnecessary, but everything is well in place and on time!
Let's take fear. There is nothing stupider than trying to get rid of it. In no case! This is our guardian... But too often he signals danger prematurely and out of place. Like any other emotion. So the choice is small: either cherish your emotions or think purposefully.
4. Positivity.
Once you have set a task, don’t look for reasons not to solve it. Otherwise, why bother with all this? To not decide? Focus not on obstacles and difficulties, but on ways out of the situation. In general, think not about the problem, but about the solution!
5. Step by step.
We always remember the end goal. This is our guideline towards which the entire process of reflection is aimed. However, it is not always worth rushing to realize the final goal right away. Many problems are much better solved step by step, and some can only be solved this way. The “path” to the goal is divided into small stages. And gradually, step by step...
The main thing here is not to get carried away, not to get sidetracked. And to do this, we always remember the final goal, about why we started all this. And don’t get carried away with the process, the result and only the result is important.
There are probably many more features that distinguish rational thinking. But let's try to master at least the five listed above. This is not so little and will require serious effort at first. But the results won’t be long in coming! Try it and you won’t notice how rational thinking will become your normal method of solving life’s problems.
Tags: self-education, thinking, determination, working on oneself, self-organization, rational thinking
Constructive idea - Great Encyclopedia of Oil and Gas, article, page 1
Constructive idea
Page 1
The constructive ideas of such algorithms have a clear geometric interpretation: in space X it is necessary to construct a hypersurface belonging to a given class of hypersurfaces, which, if possible, with fewer errors, will separate the vectors of the training sequence of one class from the vectors of the training sequence of another class. [1]
The design ideas of Sviyazev, Stepanov, Lukashevich and Bylchinsky were further developed in modern furnaces with bottom heating, in particular in numerous versions of the so-called bell furnaces. [2]
Design ideas that were used to create domestic models of electrolyzers of the BGK type. Therefore, work is being intensively carried out to create high-power bipolar electrolyzers. [4]
The most constructive ideas about the psychological and physiological essence of work activity were formulated by I. M. Sechenov [23], I. P. Pavlov [19], A. A. Ukhtomsky [25], L. S. Vygotsky [3], A. N. Leontiev [13], K. [5]
The design idea of the speed variator shown in Fig. [6]
The sketch layout expresses only the basic design idea of the device; the final layout reveals this idea more fully. [7]
The design of any technical system begins with the search for the main design idea. For hand tools, simple structures, small machines based on well-known physical effects, this search can be quite effectively carried out both by a designer-inventor and an artist-constructor, designer. As the complexity of machines increases, for a designer who does not have deep specialized knowledge in a narrow field, this opportunity decreases; the search becomes collective. Both artistic design (design) and simply the design of an industrial product begin with the search for a basic technical idea, a technical solution. Both the inventor and the designers are equally convinced of this. [8]
At this stage, it is determined whether new constructive ideas can be used to solve the identified problem. To do this, it is necessary to consider a large number of options and the possibility of solving each of them, which, of course, does not necessarily imply consideration of unpromising proposals. That is why it is advisable, first of all, to formulate the assumptions that the options under consideration must meet. [9]
Only after conducting such an analysis, a professional designer puts forward various constructive ideas. [10]
In conclusion, I cannot help but thank the organizers for the constructive idea and good organization of our meeting, which is businesslike and frank in nature, the results of which will allow us to concentrate our efforts in the interests of the prosperity of Russian society. [eleven]
Cylindrical, as well as rectangular-shaped electrolyzers that are close to them in design ideas and equivalent in terms of performance (types Nelson, Krebs, Allen-Moore, etc.) are still used to some extent in the USA, France, Japan and other countries, although they are already outdated . [12]
The result of the third stage of strategy implementation is an operational program of action designed to implement those constructive ideas that were developed in the two previous stages of preparation for restructuring. [13]
To eliminate this drawback, the U-2 nozzle shown in Fig. 35.3, g, the design idea is similar to the U-1 nozzle; it has a movable spindle (needle), which, without turning the nozzle off, can clean the hole and regulate the amount of water coming out. [14]
To eliminate this drawback, the U-2 nozzle shown in Fig. 64, g, similar in design to the U-1 nozzle, has a movable spindle (needle), with which, without turning the nozzle off, you can clean the hole and regulate the amount of water coming out. [15]
Pages: 1 2 3
www.ngpedia.ru
a constructive idea is... What is a constructive idea?
constructive idea
General subject: constructive idea, meaningful idea
Universal Russian-English dictionary. Akademik.ru. 2011.
- constructive play
- structural redundancy
See what a “constructive idea” is in other dictionaries:
- idea - 1. Main idea, consideration; intention. Abstract, banal, groundless, brilliant, brilliant, rich, big, delusional, important, leading, faithful, eternal, harmful, brilliant, main, deep, naked, ready, daring, stupid... ... Dictionary of epithets
- Glossary of chess composition terms - # A B C D E E E F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V H C ... Wikipedia
- Glossary of terms in chess composition - # A B C D E E E F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V H C H ... Wikipedia
- Melnikov, Konstantin Stepanovich
— The request “Konstantin Melnikov” is redirected here; see also other meanings. Wikipedia has articles about other people named Melnikov, Konstantin Stepanovich. Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov ... Wikipedia
- Konstantin Melnikov - Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov - K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Melnikov, Konstantin - Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Melnikov K. - Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Melnikov K. S. - Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Melnikov Konstantin Stepanovich - Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov K. S. Melnikov in the late 1920s Years of life Citizenship ... Wikipedia
- Stylistic task is a special (thoughtful) intention of the speaker to create an expressive, expressive statement that can cause a stylistic effect in the perception of the addressee (see). Presented in the text S. z. manifests itself as its stylistic... ... Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language
Books
- Important years. Why you shouldn’t put off life until later, Meg Jay, What is this book about? Someone calls the years from twenty to thirty the second youth, others the beginning of adulthood. Dr. Meg Jay, a clinical psychologist, argues that this is the most important... Category: Psychology Series: Personal Development Publisher: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, Manufacturer: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, More details Buy for 373 UAH (Ukraine only)
universal_ru_en.academic.ru
Methods
To think rationally, you need to find that foundation, that anchor that will return you from dreams to reality, direct you in the right direction. Such anchor phrases include, for example: “Don’t be nervous,” “Don’t be rude,” “Control yourself,” and so on.
When creating great goals and objectives, take off your rose-colored glasses and be realistic about your abilities. But always within the framework of positive thinking. A competent and rational attitude to the situation and to building your schedule is the key to success. For example, you set yourself tasks for the day, but do not think that it is impossible to complete so many tasks in a day. At the end of the day, when you look at your planner, you will realize that you have not completed all the tasks to the end, which will only upset you and affect your positive thinking.
The point of constructive thinking is to make things work the way you want them to.
